Saturday, September 10, 2016

ANSWERS to LENAPE HISTORY, WEEK 18. TEN MATES DEAD

THE LENAPE HISTORY OF AMERICA,
1362


To have fish,
ten mates bad thrusts,
lift themselves up, sit far away.

Wtenk ayamek tellen sakimak machi tonanup shawapama.
_______________________

The Historian tells of ten mates dead.
Do the markers agree?

YES, there are ten marks.


Some authorities say the mates died of the plague.
Would the phrase “Bad thrusts” support a plaque?


No, “Bad thrusts” and the X X X imply a violent attack.

Why did the historian use the phrase
“lift themselves up, sit far away?


The clever phrase was needed to make
the stanza self validating.  
People with a Christian religion would understand.
The mates had gone to heaven.

KENSINGTON RUNE STONE

SEARCH for LENAPE LAND
ToC LENAPE HISTORY, LENAPE LAND
ToC LENAPE LEARNING (INDEX)
SCOLL down under ARTIFACTS to KENSINGTON under RHINESTONE
ToC on KENSIGNTON

READ the Paragraph (and more if you like).

Now, go back to LENAPE LEARNING (INDEX)
Under HISTORICAL (right column)
ToC “Visitors” under FILM.
Fast forward until the red line reaches james Bay.  Then watch the rest of the film.


WHAT DOES KENSINGTON MEAN?

"KIN" = "large"
"ING" = "place"
"TON" = "town"

"large place town" = "large town"
A large town in a location south of the dikes of Lake Alexander seems consistent.  

More names in western Minnesota appear to have endured because the English were no longer changing names when the frontier reached Minnesota.
_________________________________________
1363
 After them, Peaceable was the Judge
at the pleasing land.

Wtenk nellamawa sakimanep langundowi akolaking.
 _____________________________

After the Historian told of ten mates dead.
He wrote of Peaceable at the Pleasing Land.

What could have happened?


All we really know is that ten "mates" died.  The "mates" may have been part of the rescue crew.

One possibility may have been that the rescue crew planned to leave via the old copper route to the mississippi.  The ten men may have carried the provisions for two boat crews to the loading place.  But while they waited, the boats decided to spend time fishing, before loading the provisions.  During that time, a group of thieves may have killed the mates and stolen the provisions.

The place was on Lake "Cormorant," which means "thieves."  The loading spot is on a path from a bluff above the lake.  Trees and brush would have enabled thieves to sneak up on the provision camp.

We do not know who the attackers were or if there was any punishment or resolution.  

The episode was horrifying enough for a resuce crew member to punch into the kensington Rune Stone and for a LENAPE historian to create a stanza of the year.

The pictograph implies that the Judge was NOT a LENAPE, or that the Historian was copying an old pictograph. or both?

What is your opinion?


My opinion is that the pictograph was both.  The Historian would have known the original pictograph, where the Judge had red hair.  He may have recycled the pictograph but used the word "Peaceful" in the stanza.

The new Judge may have been a Norse already in the area, when the LENAPE arrived.  He may have been powerful enough to resolve the "Ten mates dead" situation to a peaceful solution.

_ END OF SEMESTER_

This semester ends with the KENSINGTON Rune Stone episode.

This episode is important because two types of media recorded the same event.  Both media are evidence of the Norse Language in use.  The name of the place is a Nose name.

These factors are strong evidence that most Americans spoke Norse.

The episode was located in western Minnesota with a solid date of AD 1362.  The location is consistent with the known waterway, which was created in about 2,200 BC.
The man-modified terrain and other solid artifacts are solid evidence that the PRISTINE WILDERNESS paradigm is a myth.

The LENAPE continued to make history.  Some episodes are linked in the blog post.


There is enough data to create a second semester of LENAPE HISTORY.

University faculty should teach the LENAPE history.

Universities exist to teach.  They can teach facts of myth.  What is taught for a semester becomes a paradigm in the heads of most students.

If the LENAPE history is not taught, it will remain suppressed by omission from curriculums of universities.

Encourage university faculties to teach the LENAPE history.

You have an unique paradigm in your head.
Use it wisely.



  

Friday, September 9, 2016

KENSINGTON is a NORSE WORD.

WHAT DOES KENSINGTON MEAN?

“Ken” or “Kin” is defined at the bottom of KEWV1074.

“ING” or “ANG” is defined on page 
 -ANV5171.

The “TON” syllable is more difficult to find. Because the original page scans have not yet been rotated and divided.


Here is a half page image from Volume 8, page 163.

TON = TUUN = TOWN

Wednesday, September 7, 2016

WEEK 18, Part B, KENSINGTON RUNE STONE

KENSINGTON RUNE STONE


SEARCH for LENAPE LAND
ToC LENAPE HISTORY, LENAPE LAND
ToC LENAPE LEARNING (INDEX)
SCOLL down under ARTIFACTS to KENSINGTON under RHINESTONE
ToC on KENSIGNTON


READ the Paragraph (and more if you like).

Note these words in the paragraph:

“enduring mystery”
“intriguing artifact”
“exhaustive quest”

These words are evidence that the museum staff still has the PRISTINE WILDERNESS paradigm in their heads.  The museum's staff reluctance to claim the Kensington rune stone for what it is,  which is a stone punched with runes in the 14th century and found in Minnesota, diminishes the importance of the valid artifact.

If the museum staff knew the LENAPE history, which also tells of the same event, the paragraph might read:

"We have the Kensington Runestone in our museum. The Runestone and the historic knowledge of its origin continues to be the hallmark of the Runestone Museum. This enduring artifact was discovered in 1898, clutched in the roots of an aspen tree on the Olof Öhman farm near Kensington, MN (15 miles southwest of Alexandria). The Runestone has led researchers from around the world and across the centuries to a an understanding of how a runic artifact, dated 1362, could show up in North America."

The museum should add the following:

Norse people had been in North America for three hundred and fifty years.  Thousands of Norse speaking people from Greenland were migrating south, away from the bitter cold regions caused by the Little Ice Age.  The “ten mates dead” appear to have been waiting on shore with two, or more, boat loads of supplies when they were ambushed by a band of hungry, desperate thieves.  

This episode was recorded in the rune stone by a Swedish stone puncher and a LENAPE historian using self-verifying stanzas.  The date, AD 1362, is important because the date fits the known Norwegian history, other artifacts left behind by the Norwegian rescue mission, and the date pins down the LENAPE history, which was being recorded one stanza per year.  

For nearly a century the LENAPE history records the dates of historical events of North America in the 14th and 15th century.

_____________________

Now, go back to LENAPE LEARNING (INDEX)
Under HISTORICAL (right column)
ToC “Visitors” under FILM.
Fast forward until the red line reaches james Bay.  Then watch the rest of the film.

Do not listen to the guy saying “hoax.  Pay attention to the people responding to him.”

This film was suppressed for 31 years.  The suppressors may have been motivated to their action because they had the PRISTINE WILDERNESS in their heads.  But, in Canada, the
class distinction between English and “Aboriginals” continues.  Suppression by omission appears to be more active in Canada.

Saturday, September 3, 2016

ANSWERS to WEEK 17, WE WERE FRIENDS

THE LENAPE HISTORY OF AMERICA,
AD 1360



After Snow Bird, the Seizer was chief,
and all were friends.

Wtenk chilili sakimanep ayamek weminilluk.
___________________________________

What “hair-do” does Seizer have?

Seizer apparently believed in 
the Great Spirit.

Does his “body Language” fit with the Historian’s phrase that “All were Friends?

Ams wide open would be a body language for friends.

NOTE; The prominent long straight nose and the  lines for the eyes and mouth.  The same face was carved on the posts guarding the  Big House at the last LENAPE gathering in Oklahoma in AD 1928. 

Can simple images endure to define a people for over five centuries?  Or is the face a common occurrence anywhere at any time?

In this semester, we have seen a person draw a different face.  So the face is NOT a common occurrence any where at any time.  The prominent features were carefully chosen to represent most Norse people.  Some of us believe that face is a face of most Norwegians today.

Why do historians, English speaking or LENAPE, ignore the images of the LENAPE history and images maintained by small groups of Americans?


English speaking and LENAPE historians have been taught the PRISTINE WILDERNESS paradigm.  The paradigm does not encourage thoughts about Norse people rowing into America a thousand years ago.  So evidence, words and images, which show the paradigm to be a myth, are better ignored.

Part B below gives an example where evidence has been ignored for one to two centuries.


_____ PART B _____

Larry Stroud. Frode Omdahl, and myself put together a list of Norse artifacts for the 2005 conference of AAPS.  The original list had 39 pages.  Even at five items per page, there were nearly 200 Norse artifacts.  You can see the

What is the first artifact on the list?

A canal in Boston.  [There are many Norse artifacts still on display in Boston, but the people with the PRISTINE WILDERNESS paradigm in their heads chose to ignore them.  No discussion of the Boston artifacts appears in school curriculum.]

What is the last artifact on the list?

The connection between MicMac and Egypt.

Just last week Bill Davis showed us a video of a red haired woman from a family of red headed people.

  
Somebody in America has known about the red headed mummies since 1797!  I could not find a record of the mummy!  Why?

Because, for  two centuries, with the PRISTINE WILDERNESS paradigm, chose to think the red headed mummies were not valid.  The evidence did not match their paradigm.  They, apparently, did not ask if their paradigm matched the evidence.

Somebody in America knew about the red headed woman buried in Mammoth cave since 1813. 


[I visited Mammoth cave about a decade ago.   The tour guides did not mention the woman or show us her tomb.]  Why?

For the same reason.  The evidence did not match the paradigm in the guides' head.  No one asked if the paradigm explained the evidence.  The LENAPE history does.

Someone knew about the yellow haired mummies in burial caves through out Kentucky and Tennessee since 1894!  



The author of the report wrote,’’
“the flesh of the bodies was preserved and the hair was yellow"

That was a century and twelve years ago!  I did not find any record.  Why?

This hair colored evidence has been suppressed for one to two centuries.  The evidence shows that:

1.  The suppression of the evidence for American history has been going on for centuries.

2.  The evidence supports the LENAPE history more than the history myth taught to school kids.

Meanwhile back in the Ancient Artifacts Preservation Society (AAPS),  my friends have been trying to preserve ancient artifacts which are being suppressed by the universities.

But now, the red and yellow haired people in Tennessee and Kentucky are consistent with the LENAPE history.

This evidence reveals that the primary academic action toward Norse evidence is to ignore the evidence and suppress publication.

Apparently NO one in universities demands that the Early American history paradigm as taught by universities should account for the Norse evidence.

All of the evidence and Norse words in this LENAPE semester indicate that Early American History, as taught, is a myth, because the history does not account for the evidence.

Our problem:  How do we encourage universities to teach valid histories instead of a myth?

My suggestion.  

This current situation is a contest between educators and the few of us, who know the educators have been suppressing the  Norse evidence for centuries. 

Finding more Norse artifacts will not help.  They, too, will be suppressed by omission.

The phrase "Most Americans spoke Norse" is valid, simple to remember, and immediately recognized as a challenge to the history taught by the universities.  

Most evidence supports the phase.  If true history accounts for the evidence left behind, then more discussion is desired.

  We should find and use many ways to tell the kids that MOST AMERICANS SPOKE NORSE.


_________PART C__________
Our discussion has become focused on the issue of MOST AMERICANS SPOKE NORSE.  Those four valid words might be useful to overcome four centuries of false history started by the English, who invaded America in the 17th century.

On New Years Day, 2003, Larry Stroud published an article.  


What organization did Larry work for?

 Batesville Daily Guard
["BATESVILLE" means "Hill village" in Norse.  Batesville is in the hills west of the flat Mississippi River flats.]

Within 24 hours the three of us became online friends, who believed that MOST AMERICANS SPOKE NORSE.

You have been using the VIKING and the RED MAN to decipher words during the 17 weeks of this LENAPE SEMESTER.

Larry started a paradigm shift, which continues up to our discussion today.

The more correct version of 17th century history is that MOST AMERICANS SPOKE NORSE.


We, who believe the more correct version of American history, cannot find another artifact or word to convince 3.5 million kids, that they are learning a profoundly distorted history, which was created in the 17th century.



If we want a more accurate version of Early American history, we are faced with an almost overwhelming PRISTINE WILDERNESS paradigm in nearly every bodies head.  The paradigm is taught by thousands of educators that believe what they are teaching is the ONLY true Early American history.

The solution is NOT to find more evidence.  There is plenty of evidence to prove Norse were in America, when the English invaded. 

The solution IS to convince educators that there are more
histories of America.  Educators should make comparative studies of the LENAPE, Catholic, English and other histories.  Those histories should account for the evidence left behind.

Maybe the most effective way to make educators realize that there is a problem with Early American History is to make the valid words, “MOST AMERICANS SPOKE NORSE” a competing paradigm.

You can help to make a better American history by saying or writing those four simple words, “MOST AMERICANS SPOKE NORSE. “

Expect negative feedback. Be prepared to cite Roger Williams, Reider T. Sherwin, Anita Stromsted, Larry Stroud, Frode Omdahl, Thomas E. Lee, Patricia Sutherland, Myron Paine, Craig Judge and many others


America’s history will remain a myth until most students know that MOST AMERICANS SPOKE NORSE.
___________________________
 AD 1361

The tall ones,
the men from the pleasing land,
 the men with food,
the stone men.

Chikonapi akhonapi makatapi assinapi.
__________________________________

The Historian lists four groups of men,
who are “friends.”

But the men from the pleasing land may be the ones with the Father-Son-Holy ghost hair do.

The “Tall Men” may be associated with the Norse word “Chik” which means to cast a shadow.  The circle with the two horizontal lines may represent them.  These may be men from the southern regions of the Mississippi, where the Chickasaw tribe still lives.

\The syllable “MA” can mean food or “evil” as the Moravian priests translated it.   The circle with the plus sign may represent the people with the food.

The “Stone” men may be from Pipestone Minnesota.

What are your thoughts about the symbols?

My thoughts about whom the circles represent are given above.  This stanza needs a better deciphering and research.

The LENAPE Historian took two stanzas to tell us that the LENAPE had made friends with most of the people in the Red River and  Whetstone River valleys.

Every thing was getting better.  All the surrounding people were friendly. 

Then …




Friday, September 2, 2016

NAMES FOUND to be NORSE



MOST AMERICANS SPOKE NORSE
 Our discussion has become focused on the issue of MOST AMERICANS SPOKE NORSE.  Those four valid words might be useful to overcome four centuries of false history started by the English, who invaded America in the 17th century.

Way back in our time, over a decade and a half ago, on New Years Day, 2003, Larry Stroud published an article. 


What organization did Larry work for?

The same day, Forde Omdahl, a Norwegian, found Larry’s posting on the Internet and emailed me.  Within 24 hours the three of us became online friends, who believed that MOST AMERICANS SPOKE NORSE.

We continued our search for Reider T. Sherwin volumes.  We eventually found all eight (8) volumes of the VIKING and the RED MAN.  You have been using the VIKING and the RED MAN to decipher words during the 17 weeks of this LENAPE SEMESTER.

In 2003 there were NO listings of the VIKING and the RED MAN in ABEbooks.  Today, Sept. 2, 2016, there are thirteen books, priced from $26 to $300 listed in ABEbooks.

IN 2003 there were no listings of the VIKING and the RED MAN on Amazon.com.  Today there are four listings, with books priced from $16 to $94.

Clearly, someone “out there” has discovered that used VIKING and the RED MAN books can be sold at high prices.  Those volumes are the best evidence that MOST AMERICANS SPOKE NORSE.

Larry started a paradigm shift, which continues up to our discussion today.

The more correct version of 17th century history is that MOST AMERICANS SPOKE NORSE.


We, who believe the more correct version of American history, cannot find another artifact or word to convince 3.5 million kids, that they are learning a profoundly distorted history, which was created in the 17th century.



If we want a more accurate version of Early American history, we are faced with an almost overwhelming paradigm in nearly ever=r bodies head.  The paradigm is taught by thousands of educators that believe what they are teaching is the ONLY true Early American history.

The issue is NOT finding more evidence.  There is plenty of evidence to prove Norse were in America, when the English invaded. 

The issue IS convincing educators that there are more  histories.  Educators should make comparative studies of the LENAPE, Catholic, English and other histories and the evidence left behind.

Maybe the most effective way to make educators realize that there is a problem with Early American History, as taught, is to make the valid words, “MOST AMERICANS SPOKE NORSE” a competing paradigm.

You can help to make a better American history by saying or writing those four simple words, “MOST AMERICANS SPOKE NORSE. “
We, who want a better history, should say those words early and often.

Expect negative feedback. Be prepared to cite Roger Williams, Reider T. Sherwin, Anita Stromsted, Larry Stroud, Frode Omdahl, Thomas E. Lee, Patricia Sutherland, Myron Paine, Craig Judge and many other.


America’s history will remain a myth until most students know that MOST AMERICANS SPOKE NORSE.

Wednesday, August 31, 2016

WEEK 17, Part B, RED and YELLOW HAIR

I had planned to end this LENAPE semester by having you review the many Norse artifacts, which have appeared in text or pictures and then vanished from the curriculums of school kids.

Larry Stroud. Frode Omdahl, and myself put together the list of Norse artifacts for the 2005 conference of AAPS.  The original list had 39 pages.  Even at five items per page, there were nearly 200 Norse artifacts.  You can see the Norse artifact list here.

What is the first artifact on the list?

What is the last artifact on the list?

But just last week Bill Davis showed us a video of a red haired woman from a family of red headed people.
  
Somebody in America has known about the red headed mummies since 1797!  I could not find a record of the mummy!  Why?wW

So, yesterday,  I did a search on the Internet.  I found that somebody in America knew about the red headed woman buried in Mammoth cave since 1813. 


[I visited Mammoth cave about a decade ago.   The tour guides did not mention the woman or show us her tomb.]  Why?

Then, yesterday, I discovered that someone knew about the yellow haired mummies in burial caves through out Kentucky and Tennessee since 1894!  



The author of the report wrote,’’
“the flesh of the bodies was preserved and the hair was yellow"

That was a century and twelve years ago!  I did not find any record.  Why?

This hair colored evidence has been suppressed for one to two centuries.  The evidence shows that:

1.  The suppression of American history has been going on for centuries.

2.  The evidence supports the LENAPE history more than the history myth taught to school kids.

Meanwhile back in the Ancient Artifacts Preservation Society (AAPS),  my friends have been trying to preserve ancient artifacts” which have been suppressed by the academic universities.
In the past decade of diligent research, I do not remember information about red or yellow haired people in Tennessee or Kentucky.

But now, the red and yellow haired people in Tennessee and Kentucky are consistent with the LENAPE history.

This evidence reveals that the primary academic action toward Norse evidence is to ignore the evidence and suppress publication.

Apparently NO one in universities demands that the Early American history paradigm taught by universities should account for the Norse evidence left behind.

The LENAPE history is a valid history, which ia supported by most physical evidence.

All of the evidence and Norse words in this LENAPE semester indicates that Early American History, as taught, is a myth, because the evidence does not mathch the history.

Our problem:  How do we encourage universities to teach valid histories instead of a myth?

My suggestion.  

This situation is a contest between educators teaching a myth to millions of kids and the few of us, who know the educators have been suppressing the evidence for centuries. 

 More Norse artifacts will not help.  They, too, will be suppressed by omission.

The phrase "Most Americans spoke Norse" is valid.  Most evidence supports the phase.   Academic discussion will reveal suppressed information.  We should find and use many ways to tell the kids about the phrase and the suppression.

Each and all of us should say "Most Americans spoke Norse" early and often.