Saturday, July 30, 2016

ANSWERS to A small MEETING.

THE LENAPE HISTORY OF AMERICA,
AD 1348
           
The Norse on the opposite side of
 that near,
great and ample mainland
___________________________________
.
What was the LENAPE historian trying to 
illustrate?
.
.The LENAPE 
historian might have been trying to illustrate a sun on the horizon of a "near, great and ample  mainland"
.
If the historian is in James Bay, where is the other side?

VANG: Perhaps the historian was speaking about Wynland of the west (in Western Minnesota) where the “Norsk.” (who spoke the same tongue as the Greenland Norse) lived. It was probably significant that there were already Norse living in America.
.
Myron: The "other side" might have been in Lake Winnepeg and the rivers, Nelson and Red, that are in the same valley. An alternate might be that he may have been referring to Norumbega, which is now called New England.
. Because of the cold climate, which froze all the water, the Norsk man (or men) most likely walked (or paddled) into the LENAPE camp from the west.
.
The word Norse was pronounced “Norsk” in the original sounds.
What is the significance of the LENAPE historian talking about the NORSK “on the other side?”
.
The LENAPE historian was from Greenland. He may have described people speaking Norsk who came from the west of Jame bay, i.e. Minnesota.
.
The importance of this stanza is that the LENAPE historian of about AD 1350 incorporated "Norsk" into a self-validating stanza.
.
.From AD 1585 to today, English historians, except for Roger Williams, have not written that "Norsk" were on AMERICAN shores. 
.
AD 1349
A few hunters
put together
 a small meeting.
.
[A small stanza
—big implications.]


 Vang: The circle may represent an Althing (a democratic meeting) where all freemen who were present could vote
.
What may the triangle represent?

VANG:. The man elected as judge, who had Red hair, was an Alban, descendants of the Picts and Scots, who fled Britain to Iceland, Greenland and then America, to keep ahead of the Viking invasions. As the American Albans joined the Althing. Electing an Alban as judge was probably seen as being a conciliatory gesture, to ensure continuing peaceful relations between the Lenape and the Albans, with whom they had probably been intermarrying for generations.
.
Myron: The triangle appears to represent "others."  In this case, perhaps, the local Ojibway leader.  The LENAPE held a small, but crucial meeting and INVITED the local chief to attend.
.
What does the circle represent?

The circle represents a meeting where all are equal.

What style of government is represented?

Th
e style of government is  government by council.

Which American Government has the same style?
.
The United States government is basically a government by council.
.
The English would like to have us believe we have a government like their parliamentary
system.
.
  We do NOT.
.
The founding fathers, especially Benjamin Franklin, created our government based on the American people and our Bill of Rights based on Rhode Island's charter, which was based on the examples of the American people, who Roger Williams observed conducting village government.
.
The United States Government was based more on American concepts than English practice. 
. 1350
The properly selected judge had red hair.
.
What does the “fancy” hair-do mean?
. The LENAPE historian may have been trying to illustrate that, although the judge believed in the Great Spirit, the judge also believed many other religious thoughts.
.
What does the triangle under the “table” mean?
.
. The triangle under the table" implies that the "others" became partners with the LENAPE.
.
Think about the situation.  You represent thousands of starving people, who are walking into a land where people are starving too.  You hold a meeting.  You invite their leaders to the meeting.  Your tradition expects a Judge to make the final decision.  
.
You elect the leader of the local people to be the judge.  You have made a very wise choice.  Every body is still starving, but by working together the "children will (eventually) expand."
.
Why did the Historian think that we should know the judge had red hair?”
.
The reason will become more apparent in later stanzas.
.
The situation was perhaps like this:
.
The Ojibway, who spoke a dialect of Norse, were descendanted from Albans, who came from Scotland, and who mostly had curly RED HAIR.
.
The LENAPE, at that time, had mostly straight blond hair.  But those Americans, who had been in Minnesota for nearly three and a half centuries had mostly black hair and black eyes, because they had mated with women, who had Haplogroup X DNA.  The haplogroup X DNA is a dominant gene, which appears as black hair and black eyes.
.
The route of the migration of the Haplogroup X from the east end of the Mediterranean to the Christian Sea (a.k.a. Hudson Bay) is clearly marked on DNA maps.

.I do not know what emotion, if any, was involved.  But by the time the LENAPE migrated to South Dakota, the historians were sensitive to hair color.  One leader was apparently selected because he was "Not Black."
.
So the LENAPE Historian , who created this stanza from somewhere in South Dakota may have wanted us to know that, at one time, Red Haired people lived around the Christian Sea.
                     _The Order_


This page below was written by Hjalmar Holand,
in 1928.
It took him 30 years 
to get his book published.


King Mangnus' Order to Paul Knudson in 1354 is now Online in the Diplomatarium Norvegicum (volumes I-XXI).
.
The rejection of the Knudson rescue mission is recorded in the Maalan Aarum 4.6.
. The Norwegian retention of an order made in 1354 and the LENAPE perserverance of a self-verifying stanza in America that records the fate of the rescue mission may be more than super serendipity.
.
Both events were key episodes of history. Both historic recordings have survived over 660 years.
.
Yet English historians write history as if the rescue mission never happened.
.
These episodes are revealing evidence that Catholics, who spoke Norse were in North America before the English invasion.
.
That conclusion means the English false NEW WORLD is a MYTH.
. Either the English historians are incompetent or deliberately ignoring information so they can continue to publish the NEW WORLD MYTH that enabled the English to justify the invasion of North America.
.
This evidence, and more, implies that the English were NOT incompetent.  The English actions were deliberate.  They knew what they were doing.
.
They and the professors almost convinced us that there were NO Catholics, who spoke Norse, in America, when the English invaded.
. Meanwhile, they PROFOUNDLY DISTORTED history.
_ROGER WILLIAMS_
WORDS
.
What and when did ROGER WILLIAMS know?


VANG: “Wise and judicious men with whom I have discoursed, maintained their (the Indians) original to the Northward from Tartaria, TO DRAW THEIR LINE FROM ICELAND, because the name SACKMAKAN (the name for Indian Prince, about the Dutch) is the name for a Prince in Iceland.”

At my now taking ship in 1643. "

Myron: Both Roger Williams and the Dutch Governor of New York agreed about the same word.
.
SACKMAKAN


What does the name mean?

Vang: The name SACKMAKAN (the name for Indian Prince, about the Dutch) is the name for a Prince in Iceland.

Myron:  See page at SANGMAN


Which nationality used the name?

VANG: Icelander/ Norwegians or Norse 

Myron: "Norsemen were the chiefs or captains, because many of them were captains of a group of men paddling a boat."

BONUS ARTIFACT
.

2 comments:

  1. The “great, near and ample mainland” may also have been the Danish settlement of Nova Dania, (New Denmark), situated near the Nelson River, Manitoba.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Might have been. The KEY element is that a NORSK was doing the talking.


    ReplyDelete